Tuesday December 12, 2017
Banner
News Feeds:
Blog PDF Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Monday, 14 March 2011 17:31

watergate_exposedsmlTalk about the Watergate Exposed Book

Disclosing new factual material about the Watergate incident, this provocative exposé of the famed break-in of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in 1972 reveals that the burglars were set up and explains how our historical consciousness has been altered to obscure the truth. Written by a confidential informant, this never-before-told story rewrites the accepted truth of the scandal that rocked the political world and the entire nation while taking readers on a behind-the-scenes tour of a major criminal investigation. Drilling to the core of the political nightmare, shocking acts of manipulation and deceit are uncovered as new light is shed on the players and puppet masters behind the event that led to the only presidential resignation in U.S. history.

And it looks as though we have an interesting situation, whereby the authors of this work have been tossing barbs at each other. This has been happening in emails and has spilled over onto the net. There have been posts at the educationalforum.com and today (April 25,2011) Butch asked if TrineDay would post his commentary. TrineDay finds the "squabble" interesting, and hasn't been able to validate any of the charges or countercharges. Shades of Cointelpro techniques. We recommend, as always, that readers beware! Caveat Lector!

Last Updated on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 00:04
 

Comments  

 
0 #4 THIS IS A PUBLIC E-MAIL TO JIM HOUGANwatergateexposed 2011-07-20 00:49
THIS IS A PUBLIC E-MAIL TO JIM HOUGAN
TO: JIM HOUGAN
FROM: ROBERT MERRITT
SUBJECT: YOUR E-MAIL TO ME RE: THE SCANDAL THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME
 
DEAR JIM,
I RECEIVED THE ATTACHED E-MAIL FROM YOU. (SEE BELOW)
 
“FIRST OF ALL, I REALLY WANT TO THANK YOU FOR DOING A SPLENDID JOB ON REVIEWING MY BOOK “WATERGATE EXPOSED”, - AND OTHER THINGS THAT YOU THOUGHT YOU KNEW ABOUT MY BOOK, ASSIGNMENTS, WITNESSING PEOPLE AND EVENTS AND MY LIFE!!!”
EVEN THOUGH I FEEL THAT YOU TRIED YOUR BEST TO YOUR ABILITY (NO MATTER HOW LIMITED THAT MAY BE) TO DO A HATCHET JOB ON ME.
I FEEL THAT YOU HAVE NOT HURT MY CREDIBILITY IN THE LEAST BUT IF ANYTHING YOU GAVE MY BOOK AND MY CREDENTIALS ONE HELL OF A BOOST!
EVEN THOUGH, I COULD BUT I WON’T CHOP YOUR E-MAIL INTO LITTLE PIECES OF LIVER BUT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT TO YOU TWO SMALL ITEMS AND THERE ARE: (1) IN WASHINGTON, THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES WAS SUBJECTED TO SURVEILLANCE, INFILTRATION, AND DISRUPTION. SO WERE THE *RED HOUSE BOOKSTORE AND UNDERGROUND NEWSPAPERS LIKE THE QUICKSILVER TIMES.
* THE RED HOUSE BOOKSTORE WAS A POLICE AND FBI FRONT AND OPERATION. THE ONLY REASON THAT I BROKE INTO THE RED HOUSE BOOKSTORE WAS TO GET EXPERIENCE BY TRIAL RUNS AND REHEARSING FOR THE REAL BREAK-INS.
(2) THE 400-PAGE CIA REPORT WAS SUPPOSEDLY ENTITLED “CONFIDENTIAL REPORT ON INTELLIGENCE OF MILITARY SECRET OPERATIONS ON NIXON.” BY THE WAY OF CLARIFICATION, THE “REPORT WAS SAID TO BE SUBTITLED “REPORT OF OPERATIONS OF SECRET SURVEILLANCE AND EAVESDROPPING”. PERHAPS TO THE FACILITATES DISCUSSION THE PUTATIVE REPORT WAS CONVENIENTLY REFERRED TO BY ITS ACRONYM , C.R.I.M.S.O.N.R.O.S.E. (THOUGH C.R.I.M.S.O.N.R.O.S.S.E. WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE ACCURATE).
JIM HOUGAN, I AM SORRY BUT IF I HAVE TO GIVE YOU OR THIS E-MAIL AN ACRONYM, - THEN, THE ACRONYM WOULD HAVE TO BE “M.O.S.T. S.T.U.P.I.D. H.I.S.T.O.R.I.A.N. A.N.D. A.U.T.H.O.R. O.N. T.H.E. S.U.B.J.E.C.T. O.F. W.A.T.E.R.G.A.T.E.!!!”
FIRST OF ALL, I ASKED CARL SHOFFLER ABOUT “THE ACRONYM AS TO WHY IT WAS MISSING AN EXTRA “S” IN THE WORD ROSE”, - AND CARL SAID “IT MADE MORE SENSE FOR THE ONE “S” IN THE ACRONYM TO PLAY AS A DOUBLE “S” BECAUSE EVERYONE LIKED THE CODE WORD OR ACRONYM “CRIMSON ROSE”.
     ALSO, I ASKED CARL ABOUT “IF THEY LEFT A CHAIN DANGLING AT
     THE CIA HEADQUARTERS?” AND CARL REPLIED SIMPLY “NO, THERE
     WAS NO CHAIN LEFT AT THE CIA, - DO YOU THINK WE WERE  
     STUPID?!”
I AM SORRY, JIM, BUT I HAVE NEVER BEEN INSIDE THE CIA, OBVIOUSLY, YOU HAVE! THEREFORE, I DON’T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE U. S. MARINES GUARDING ROOMS THAT ARE TOP SECRET OR LOGS OR CAMERAS, - BUT I AM SURE THAT THERE ARE WAYS TO GET AROUND THINGS LIKE THAT, - ESPECIALLY WHEN ALMOST EVERYBODY IS EXPERIENCED IN THE SPY BUSINESS!!
 
 
 
ALSO, REGARDING DOUGLAS CADDY WHOM I MAY OR MAY NOT OWE AN APOLOGY TO SEEMS TO BE MORE OR LESS A VICTIM OF CERTAIN THINGS THAT I HAVE SAID OR DONE IN THE PAST. HOWEVER, IF I WAS WRONG, THEN, IT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH CERTAIN PEOPLE IN THE WATERGATE ARENA THAT CLAIM FACT TO BE AUTHORS AND/OR HISTORIANS! CERTAIN INVESTIGATIONS ARE IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW AND IF I AM INFORMED THAT THESE PEOPLE INTENTIONALLY AND DELIBERATELY TRIED TO DUPE OR MISLEAD ME, THEN, THE SHIT WILL HIT THE FAN!! AND, BELIEVE ME, I AM FROM WEST VIRGINIA AND WE DO NOT BITE OUR TONGUES, - I WILL NAME NAMES!!!
I WISH THAT EVERYONE WOULD STOP TRYING TO UNDERMINE MY INTELLIGENCE AND REMEMBER ONE FACT AND THAT IS “I AM HISTORY! I MADE HISTORY! I AM HISTORY!” EVERYONE ELSE IS ONLY WRITING ABOUT WHAT THEY BELIEVE TO BE HISTORY BUT THESE SAME PEOPLE WERE NOT INVOLVED IN HISTORY AND NOR DID THEY KNOW CARL SHOFFLER, DOUGLAS CADDY OR MYSELF WHEN WE WERE MAKING HISTORY!!!
IN ANY EVENT, JIM, I REALLY WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THIS BOOST EVEN THOUGH I REALLY DON’T RECOGNIZE OR REMEMBER YOU FROM THE HISTORICAL ERA OF THE WATERGATE HISTORY!
R.O.B.E.R.T. M.E.R.R.I.T.T.          
 
 
 
0 #3 "Watergate Exposed and Douglas Caddy Exposedwatergateexposed 2011-05-15 18:06
“WATERGATE EXPOSED”
AND
DOUGLAS CADDY EXPOSED
Friday, May 13, 2011


“Watergate and truth does not go together by any standards except in the
Eyes of God”!

Quote from a fan - “ I see the sparring persists with Caddy. He is finished and he is there only to drain your energy and to distract you! I look forward to when you will not find it unnecessary to respond to him ” ! Unquote.

First of all, I think Douglas Caddy’s letter on the Education Forum was absolutely great! After all, all he did was to quote from my book “ Watergate Exposed ” .
Everything that Douglas Caddy said “ Was all true ” !!
“ Yes, - I did all of those things and much much more that is in the book and not in my book “ !
I was very proud of my work that was admitted in “ Watergate Exposed ” and including the fact that I was called a sociopath. After all, - all of these things were the qualifications of being a highly trained and professional CI (Confidential Informant)!!
Does it mean that I am now doing these things or that I am proud of the past! That is up to me to make that determination but if I still have those feelings, then, why would I be exposing my life and work in “ Watergate Exposed’’ and expressing my remorse in the book?!!
I want the whole world to know that Robert Merritt does not hate the United States of America or the government or the American people!
I am only exposing and revealing the rogue elements within the government and in Its’ agencies, - that is, the controlling forces that tries to manipulate and cause injury to the American people, in particular the agencies that abuse programs like COINTELPRO, which personally I find necessary to implement at times just like waterboarding, secret courts and capital punishment by discretionary judgment.
It is necessary at times for American citizens to sacrifice some of their freedoms and liberties in order to have a true democracy but at the same time we cannot allow those sacrifices to impinge our will being and lose sight by placing ourselves in great harm.
However, at the time, I was very proud of all of the evil and malicious deeds and assignments that I carried out for the United States government! After all, I was brain washed to believe that the people that I hurt were actually enemies of the State!
So, (to Douglas Caddy), - thank you for quoting the facts in our book!

I am now addressing Pat Speer who was kind enough to also review the postings on the Education Forum. I sincerely hope that you Mr. Speer have read our book
“ Watergate Exposed ” before posing these questions to me!
It is true that I was not a very nice person and that I might have been a sociopath, - after all, I wasn’t supposed to be nice! Can you possibly imagine a nice person doing the things that I was ordered to do at the behest of our government and for the sake of national security?!
Now, that we have established that I was not a very nice person, perhaps we can move on to the real truth and the “nitty gritty” of these matters.
Let ’s take your questions one by one and I promise that you will get your answers very truthfully!
First of all, Douglas Caddy was supposed to write the story (facts) as I reported them to him but you will discover that Douglas Caddy did in fact change, modify, alter, generate and LIE about a lot of things that I told him, not to mention also the facts that Caddy deliberately and intentionally omitted and deleted!
I would like to describe my life and the facts regarding “ Watergate Exposed ”
and that is, - this book is a historical revisionist review account of the life and true story of Robert Merritt as a Confidential Informant involved in Watergate, covert, subversive activities, COINTELPRO and profiling for the United States government.
The Wall Street Journal named Robert Merritt as being the Nation’s #1 Top Confidential Informant.
If it were not for Robert Merritt, there would have been NO WATERGATE!
If Robert Merritt had not revealed advanced information about the Watergate Break-in, then, President Richard M. Nixon would not have resigned in disgrace, - and the history of the world would have been much different!
The story of Robert Merritt’s life and facts are documented and accounted for by FBI FOIA files, Library of Congress documents, Pike Committee documents, Watergate Special Prosecutors documents, credible media accounts, public testimony and documents from the National Archives.
When you read our book “ Watergate Exposed ” be prepared to enter into a mind-boggling and secret world that most of us cannot imagine exists. ”
Mr. Speer, not to be arrogant but frankly I don’t give a damn whether you or anyone believes me or not! Believe me, it does not matter to me at all! After all, I am history and not a writer, - in other words, many people and authors have written about me!
Did it ever occur to you or anyone that if I had not done anything regarding Watergate or history that no one would have ever spelled my name must less to have written about me! So, therefore, I must have credibility!!
And believe me, the only person who has been played was me, - not Douglas Caddy!
You will soon find out by finishing reading this posting that Douglas Caddy has not only played me but all of you and not to mention the fact that he is a habitual liar!!
Douglas Caddy has never told the truth from the beginning!
It is true that I could write several dozens of books and my story would yet to be told!
Douglas Caddy pretends that he is a little envious of me because I am not afraid to tell my story in full, - and he cannot!!
In a moment of so, you and the world will know the true Douglas Caddy or at least as much as I intend to reveal and expose about him at this time!!
Mr. Speer, for someone who has never read my book you certainly have made an opinion and at least pretended to be an authority regarding Robert Merritt?!
You certainly had time to write this review on the behalf of Douglas Caddy but you have made yourself look very foolish to others and me by not taking the time and energy by not reading “ Watergate Exposed ” or at least researching Douglas Caddy with his dark shadows!
Of course, I knew that Douglas Caddy was working with the CIA front Mullen Company and that all of the burglars were also CIA operatives.
Your comment “Set me straight, - no pun intended ” obvious a homophobic remark that does not offend me at all because as strange as it may seem to you after reading my book you may be surprised to be informed that I am also rather homophobic myself in a different sort of way, which I will not explain!
It appears to me that you have obviously spent sometime in researching me to know a little something about Carl Shoffler and myself and our relationship! I don’t know what you mean by your remark “ The claim is now … ” , - - nothing has ever changed about my relationship with Shoffler or the fact that I ever said anything differently about my advanced knowledge of the Watergate Break-in! ”
By the way, Pat, it must have been a terrible ordeal for me to become a celebrity and quite a conspiracy for the advantage for me to be a footnote to a footnote??! Sorry, but this sounds like something only an idiot would say!!
Why would Carl Shoffler sell anything to the Democrats or the military, - stupid?!
Now, after I am happy to have planned this great conspiracy with Carl Shoffler 40 years ago to call Pat Speer and Douglas Caddy stupid, - - - now, we will get to the real truth and nitty gritty as I promised the world, so Douglas Caddy start biting your nails!
Whatever I said about Mo Dean still stands, - she still is “ Mo the ho!” However, at this point in time, she is totally irrelevant to everyone and myself! Mo has always been John Dean’s diversion to his true story and role in Watergate!!
By the way, I do own “ Silent Coup and Secret Agenda” but I have never read either one except the one passage that was written about me in “ Secret Agenda ” !!
So, how could I have ever incorporate anything from those books into “ Watergate Exposed ” ??!
Also, get your facts straight, the CIA, John Dean and Douglas Caddy were the ones who thought they were controlling everything but they over-looked the most powerful agency of the military and let us not forget the 100 families!

Tom Huston started the Huston Plan in the White House sometime in early 1970 and it was terminated at the request of John Mitchell on September 18, 1970 to President Nixon.
Strange, - because I was paid under the Huston Plan from 1971 to late 1972!
Tom Huston was a good friend of Douglas Caddy!
Attorney David Wilson also worked with Tom Huston, Douglas Caddy and John Dean in the White House.
David Wilson could verify that Caddy worked with the Huston Plan, which was a domestic intelligence program for dirty and illegal tricks!!!
Why did Douglas Caddy work as a volunteer for the CIA Mullen Company with John Dean in the White House in March, April and May of 1972 ???!!
What did Douglas Caddy do for John Dean in the White House???!!
What type of volunteer work did Douglas Caddy do for John Dean regarding the Huston Plan, on May Day 1972 and the Watergate Break-in???!!
What was the real relationship between Douglas Caddy and John Dean???!!
Was Douglas Caddy and John Dean working on the re-election campaign for Richard Nixon inside of The White House???!!
What were the true circumstances with Douglas Caddy representing the Watergate Burglars who were all CIA operatives???!!
How did Douglas Caddy really know about the Watergate Break-in and to show up at the court house for their arraignments the next morning???!!
What was Douglas Caddy’s real relationship with E. Howard Hunt???!!

Now, it is time for Douglas Caddy to start addressing the truth and stop making Robert Merritt the fall guy and the sacrificial lamb!!!

APPENDIX NINE
(from “ Watergate Exposed ” )

On July, 10, 1972 Harold H. Titus Jr., U. S. Attorney for the District of Columbia; Earl J. Silbert, Principal Assistant U. S. Attorney; Donald E. Campbell, Assistant U. S. Attorney; and Seymour Glanzer, Assistant U. S. Attorney filed a “Motion to Compel Testimony of Grand Jury Witness Michael Douglas Caddy.” The Motion stated, “The United States of America, therefore, seeks the following relief from this Court:
“An Order that the witness Mr. Caddy be directed on pain of contempt to respond before the grand jury to the questions specified in the Appendix attached to this Motion, all questions, which he without justification refused to answer on Friday, June 30, 1972, Wednesday, July 5, 1972 and Friday, July 7, 1972.”
The following is the Appendix attached to the Motion listing the 38 key questions.
The question was, when was the last time that you saw Mr. Hunt?
When, that is the approximate date, was the attorney-client relationship
established on the current matter in which you represent Mr. Hunt?
All right, do you represent Mr. Hunt with respect to the matters being investigated
by this grand jury?
When was the last time you spoke to your client… Mr. Hunt.
Other than legal fees, have you received any money, or any pecuniary or financial
benefits from Mr. Hunt in any manner, shape or form during the entire period you
have you known him?
All right, I believe the first question that we asked you, at which point you
indicated a desire to consult with counsel, was the date on which Mr. X. became
your client.
When was the last time you saw Mr. X?
When was the last time you spoke to Mr. X?


Did you see Mr. Hunt within one-quarter mile of the Watergate Hotel on June 16
or June 17 of this year?
Now again, just for the record, what was the subject matter, the general field of
law, in which you represented Mr. X prior to July 7th, 1972?
I believe the question was prior to Thursday, July 6th of this year, when you
represented Mr. X., what fee arrangement or retainer agreement did you have with
Mr. X relevant to the subject matter in which you represented him as an attorney.
The question prior to the July 6th of this year - - that is yesterday - have you ever
- - has Mr. X. ever paid you a fee for representing him as an attorney?
At what time did you receive a telephone call in the early morning hours of
Saturday, June 17, 1972?
From whom did you receive a telephone call in the early morning hours of
June 17, 1972?
Did you receive a telephone call from Mrs. Barker, the wife of Bernard L.
Barker?
Did you receive a telephone call from Everett Howard Hunt in the early morning
hours of Saturday, June 17, 1972?
Did you receive a telephone call from Mr. X in the early morning hours of Saturday, June 17, 1972 and just so the record is clear, I will confine the time from 12: A.M., in the morning until 6:00 A.M. in the morning?
From whom were the half dozen phone calls you received between midnight, Friday, June 16th and 8:30 A.M., Saturday, June 17th?
Now, as to those half a dozen phone calls in which you have now invoked the attorney-client privilege as to the identity or the person, were they from men or from women?
I believe the questions that was asked you…was whether or not any of the half a dozen phone calls that you received were from clients of yours in the attorney-client sense of the word?
During the hours of midnight. June 16th, Friday through 8:30 Saturday morning, that is 8:30 A.M. Saturday, June 17th, to whom did you make telephone calls?
Were any of the persons to whom you made a telephone calls clients of yours in the attorney-client sense of the relationship?
I believe the question was between the hours of midnight, Friday, June 16th, and 8:30 A.M. Saturday, June 17th, did you receive or have any visitors at your apartment?
Whether or not any of the about half a dozen telephone calls that you have indicated that you made while in your apartment between the hours of midnight, June 16th and 8:30 A.M. Saturday, June 17th, were any of those long distance telephone calls?
Between the hours of Friday, June 16th and Saturday, 8:30 A.M., June 17th did you receive - were any of the half a dozen phone calls that you received long distance?
Between the hours of Friday at midnight June 16th, and 8:30 A.M. Saturday, June 17th, did you receive a visit from Mr. Everett Howard Hunt?
Did you receive a visit during the same period of time that is midnight, June 16th, to 8:30 A.M. June 17th, from Mr. X?
When did Mrs. Dorothy Hunt first become a client of yours?
Outside of occasions to which Mr. Everett Howard Hunt has used his - - a different pen name under which he authored a number of books, to which you have referred in your pervious answer, has Mr. Everett Howard Hunt used any names other than his own?
To your knowledge has Mr. X. ever used any names other than his own name of Mr. X?
At the Central cellblock, did you speak to anyone there, or what did you do there, sir?
Now, with respect to Mr. Bernard L. Barker, what fee arrangement or retainer agreement did you make with him at that time with respect to his representation?
With respect to the Mr. (Rolando) Martinez what fee arrangement did you make to represent him?
With respect to Virgilio Gonzalez?
With James W. McCord, Jr.?
With respect to Mr. Frank Fiorini or Frank Sturgis?
Prior to your going to 23rd and L. Streets, Northwest, that morning, Saturday, June 17th, 1972 had you been asked by anybody to represent those, any, or all or some of those five individuals?
Who, if anyone, asked you to represent those five individuals who were in the jail at 23rd and L Streets, Northwest, that morning?

“ Watergate Exposed ” is undoubtedly going to be one of the most unusual and unique books of all times! It is the only book ever written in history where the subject Robert Merritt, a top Confidential Informant from the United States government who tries to expose his role with the rogue elements of COINTELPRO agencies, - and who unfortunately was responsible for bringing down the President of the United States, - and a book that was written by secretly and covertly with the intent of malice by a CIA operative Douglas Caddy who never wanted this book to be made public!
Douglas Caddy and the CIA’s intentions were to exploit Robert Merritt of all of his secrets concerning Watergate and other confidential matters, - WHICH NEVER HAPPENED!
Unfortunately, Douglas Caddy and the CIA failed in their task to obtain the secrets
and information that they so desperately wanted and nor did they stop the publication
of “Watergate Exposed”!

Truth and justice will never be oppressed but by the grace of God will forever prevail!

Why is Douglas Caddy so protective of John Dean???!!
Why did Douglas Caddy collude with the attorneys of John Dean in the lawsuit against Len Colodny???!!
Why were there no witnesses ever called to testify in the John Dean lawsuit against Len Colodny???!!
Maybe Douglas Caddy and John Dean can explain why Len Colodny was paid $410,000.00 to get Colodny to agree to let Dean dismiss Dean’s own lawsuit against Len Colodny???!!
(See the attached legal documents below)
First legal document from the lawyer Martin Lobel, dated: December 9, 2005, addressed to: Len Colodny reads:
Dear Len, (Colodny)
Your recollection about the resolution of John Dean’s libel case against you because your book, Silent Coup, is correct. The case was dismissed with prejudice (see attached) and you received $410,000.00 from your insurance company State Farm.
IT WAS A TOTAL VICTORY.
Martin Lobel, Attorney

Second document reads:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


ORDER

Plaintiffs, Maureen K. Dean and John W. Dean has moved to dismiss…………
On September 27, 1999.
(Second paragraph reads):
Plaintiffs Motion is hereby GRANTED and this action shall be dismissed with
prejudice as to defendant (Len) Colodny.
Emmet G. Sullivan
United States District Judge


I BELIEVE THAT I HAVE PRESENTED MY CASE AGAINST MICHAEL DOUGLAS CADDY!!!

Robert Merritt

Friday, May 13, 2011 - 13 pages
 
 
0 #2 MERRITT AND  THE CADDY CONNECTIONwatergateexposed 2011-04-26 00:06
MERRITT
AND
 
THE CADDY CONNECTION
 
 
It is now clear to me that in addition to his long-standing CIA connection, Douglas Caddy had at least one other reason to sabotage my book Watergate Exposed – and that is his connection to the Watergate figure John Dean. During the time I worked with Caddy on the manuscript, it became apparent to me that Caddy was extremely protective of John Dean. In fact, on several occasions he refused to use information I gave him regarding John Dean and his wife to be Mo Biner (Maureen Dean).
 
Mo and John Dean came up on several occasions. Once when Carl Shoffler, the arresting officer at the Watergate on June 17, 1972, showed me a portfolio that came from the DNC offices. The portfolio included photos of Mo Biner, which were very tastefully done in almost a classy Playboy style – both clothed and nude pictures in a beautiful soft touch. Prior to this I had been with Shoffler when he met with John Dean and some military brass at the Old Stein restaurant in April of 1972. The last time was when I was casually introduced to Mo, her friend Heidi Rikan, Washington porno operator Buster Riggin and the mobster Joe Nesline in 1973.
 
At the time of our so-called collaboration, I didn’t know about Caddy’s CIA connections, but I was certainly aware that he had a relationship with John Dean. For example, as is now generally known to Watergate researchers, Caddy actually worked for John Dean in the Spring of 1972, which of course was shortly before the Watergate break-in. In fact, on a number of occasions, Caddy talked to me in confidence about John and Mo Dean and his friend E. Howard Hunt - but always with the understanding that Dean would never be mentioned in my book. I expect to be able to elaborate on these subjects in the near future.
 
 
+2 #1 Watergate Exposedwatergateexposed 2011-03-14 22:22
Hello everyone!
 
Copyright © 2017. Water Gate Exposed.